hortus:publish
This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Create, submit, and publish research outputs
Use this section when you need to:
- create a new resource, project page, event, news item, or metadata format
- understand the difference between draft, submitted, waiting, approved, and published states
- use My Contributions to follow what happens after submissions
- see how governed workflows shape publication inside HORTUS
Main roles:
- Contributors / Researchers
- Maintainers
- Moderators
Related sections:
HORTUS uses a moderated publication model.
This ensures quality, consistency, and reusability of research outputs. The platform does not assume that uploading something should make it public immediately. Instead, contributor workflows guide you through creation, metadata, draft management, upload, moderation, and later dissemination. This protects quality and makes the resulting record more useful to others.
Moderation workflow
Moderation is a core feature of HORTUS.
What moderators check
- content quality
- metadata completeness
- permissions
- consistency
Outcomes
- Approved → item progresses
- Rejected → revisions required
Implications for users
- publication is not immediate
- quality standards must be met
- iteration may be required
Best practices for publishing
- complete all metadata fields
- use clear and accurate descriptions
- attach relevant files
- verify permissions before submission
- review content before submitting
Summary
Publishing in HORTUS is:
- structured
- moderated
- metadata-driven
Users can:
- create multiple types of content
- track their lifecycle
- improve quality through review
- disseminate research outputs effectively
hortus/publish.1775639622.txt.gz · Last modified: by savino.frisardi