This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
My Contributions
The My Contributions section is accessible from the My Workspace area, where it serves as a reference point for tracking your activities.
My Contributions is the place where you monitor what happens after you create something in HORTUS. It is your personal follow-up area for research outputs, project pages, and metadata proposals. Instead of wondering whether your work is still a draft, already submitted, waiting for approval, or ready for reuse, you can check its status in one structured workspace view.
This feature is especially valuable for researchers because it reduces uncertainty. Publishing or contributing to a collaborative research platform can feel opaque if you do not know what happens after clicking Save or Send to moderation. My Contributions makes that process visible. It helps you understand where your work currently stands in the HORTUS lifecycle and what your next action should be.
It is also attractive because it does not treat research activity as a single flat list. Instead, it organizes contributions by entity type and by lifecycle stage, so that you can immediately distinguish between work that is still being prepared, work that has already been submitted, and work that may require a moderation decision.
What My Contributions manages
My Contributions covers three main contribution types:
- Marketplace resources
- Metadata formats
- Projects
Each type represents a different way of contributing to the HORTUS research environment. Resources correspond to research outputs and catalogue items. Metadata formats correspond to structured descriptive models that can later be reused on the platform. Projects correspond to research initiative pages and collaboration spaces.
Why this matters for researchers
My Contributions is useful because it allows you to:
- keep track of what you created or submitted
- return to items that are still drafts
- monitor items that are waiting for moderation
- understand whether a contribution has moved forward in its lifecycle
- follow collaboration-related signals such as project join requests and invitations
- act more confidently inside a moderated research platform
For a researcher, this means that My Contributions is not only a status page. It is a research workflow monitor. It gives visibility over the evolution of your contributions and helps you stay in control of your work over time.
How the feature is structured
The main logic of My Contributions is simple: it separates your work by type and then by stage.
IMMAGINE
Main areas of the feature
| My Contributions area | What it is for | Typical user action |
|---|---|---|
| Resources / Metadata / Projects tabs | Separate contribution types so you can focus on one kind of entity at a time. | Move to the tab that matches the item you created or submitted. |
| Overview cards / panels | Give a quick visual summary of what is still draft, what has been submitted, and what may require moderation. | Use the overview first to decide where your attention is needed. |
| Show all links | Open the full detailed list for one panel or one lifecycle stage. | Use Show all when you want to move from the dashboard summary into the corresponding list view. |
| Status filters | Narrow the list to a specific lifecycle state such as waiting for approval or rejected. | Filter the list to focus only on the items that currently matter. |
| Moderator actions | Enable authorised users to review and decide on pending contributions. | Approve or reject a contribution if you have moderation rights. |
| Joining project requests and invitations | Surface collaboration-related signals linked to project participation. | Check whether your request to join a project is still pending, or whether you received a new invitation. |
What it manages
- drafts
- submitted items
- approved content
- rejected items
- published outputs
Why this matters
- centralised control of your work
- visibility of lifecycle status
- easier management of revisions
Structure
Items are usually organised by:
- type (resource, project, event, metadata)
- status (draft, pending, approved, published)
How to read lifecycle panels
Each item shows:
- current status
- required actions (if any)
- history of changes
Typical lifecycle logic
- Create item → Draft
- Submit → Pending
- Review → Approved / Rejected
- If approved → Published
- If rejected → revise and resubmit
Moderation workflow
Moderation is a core feature of HORTUS.
What moderators check
- content quality
- metadata completeness
- permissions
- consistency
Outcomes
- Approved → item progresses
- Rejected → revisions required
Implications for users
- publication is not immediate
- quality standards must be met
- iteration may be required
Best practices for publishing
- complete all metadata fields
- use clear and accurate descriptions
- attach relevant files
- verify permissions before submission
- review content before submitting
Summary
Publishing in HORTUS is:
- structured
- moderated
- metadata-driven
Users can:
- create multiple types of content
- track their lifecycle
- improve quality through review
- disseminate research outputs effectively