hortus:publish:contributions
This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
My Contributions
My Contributions is the area where you track your activity.
What it manages
- drafts
- submitted items
- approved content
- rejected items
- published outputs
Why this matters
- centralised control of your work
- visibility of lifecycle status
- easier management of revisions
Structure
Items are usually organised by:
- type (resource, project, event, metadata)
- status (draft, pending, approved, published)
How to read lifecycle panels
Each item shows:
- current status
- required actions (if any)
- history of changes
Typical lifecycle logic
- Create item → Draft
- Submit → Pending
- Review → Approved / Rejected
- If approved → Published
- If rejected → revise and resubmit
Moderation workflow
Moderation is a core feature of HORTUS.
What moderators check
- content quality
- metadata completeness
- permissions
- consistency
Outcomes
- Approved → item progresses
- Rejected → revisions required
Implications for users
- publication is not immediate
- quality standards must be met
- iteration may be required
Best practices for publishing
- complete all metadata fields
- use clear and accurate descriptions
- attach relevant files
- verify permissions before submission
- review content before submitting
Summary
Publishing in HORTUS is:
- structured
- moderated
- metadata-driven
Users can:
- create multiple types of content
- track their lifecycle
- improve quality through review
- disseminate research outputs effectively
hortus/publish/contributions.1775056099.txt.gz · Last modified: by savino.frisardi
