User Tools

Site Tools


hortus:publish:contributions

This is an old revision of the document!


My Contributions

My Contributions is the area where you track your activity.


What it manages

  • drafts
  • submitted items
  • approved content
  • rejected items
  • published outputs

Why this matters

  • centralised control of your work
  • visibility of lifecycle status
  • easier management of revisions

Structure

Items are usually organised by:

  • type (resource, project, event, metadata)
  • status (draft, pending, approved, published)

How to read lifecycle panels

Each item shows:

  • current status
  • required actions (if any)
  • history of changes

Typical lifecycle logic

  • Create item → Draft
  • Submit → Pending
  • Review → Approved / Rejected
  • If approved → Published
  • If rejected → revise and resubmit

Moderation workflow

Moderation is a core feature of HORTUS.


What moderators check

  • content quality
  • metadata completeness
  • permissions
  • consistency

Outcomes

  • Approved → item progresses
  • Rejected → revisions required

Implications for users

  • publication is not immediate
  • quality standards must be met
  • iteration may be required

Best practices for publishing

  • complete all metadata fields
  • use clear and accurate descriptions
  • attach relevant files
  • verify permissions before submission
  • review content before submitting

Summary

Publishing in HORTUS is:

  • structured
  • moderated
  • metadata-driven

Users can:

  • create multiple types of content
  • track their lifecycle
  • improve quality through review
  • disseminate research outputs effectively

hortus/publish/contributions.1775056099.txt.gz · Last modified: by savino.frisardi