Table of Contents

Resource Management

General Description

The Add Resource section allows authenticated users to add resources to the database within the DaMSym system.

Each resource represents a unit of content (text, excerpt, or document) that may subsequently be included in the semantic search engine and made available for public consultation.

The entire management process is governed by a multi-level approval workflow, which distinctly involves the roles of Researcher, Reviewer, and WP Lead.

This model ensures that every new resource is verified and validated before final publication.


Adding New Resources (Add Resource)

Once authenticated, the user sees the “Add Resource” button in the top navigation bar, which provides access to the submission form.

From this section, it is possible to upload a new resource by completing the mandatory and optional fields provided for the selected language.

The creation of a resource follows these steps:

All mandatory fields must be completed in order to submit a resource; otherwise, the system displays validation errors.

Create new item


Add Latin Resource


Add Church Slavonic Resource


Add Greek Resource


Add Arabic Resource


Structure and Behavior of the Form

The resource submission and editing form is composed of multiple adaptive sections, which dynamically update according to the selected language.

Common Fields

Available Actions in the Form

During the saving process, the system performs automatic validation checks to ensure that all required fields are correctly completed and consistent with the selected language.


Creation and Approval Workflow

Each resource created within DaMSym follows a defined status path, regulating interactions between Researcher, Reviewer, and WP Lead.

Status Description Enabled Role
Draft Resource saved as draft. Visible and editable only by the author. Researcher / Reviewer
Waiting for approval Resource submitted to the WP Lead for approval. Researcher / Reviewer
Approved Resource approved and made searchable within the corpus. WP Lead
Rejected Resource rejected by the WP Lead, possibly with an explanatory note. WP Lead

Operational Flow Summary

Step Action Responsible Role
1 Add Resource Researcher / Reviewer / WP Lead
2 Save draft Researcher / Reviewer
3 Confirm submission Researcher / Reviewer
4 Review resource WP Lead
5a Approve → Published in search WP Lead
5b Reject → Returns to Draft WP Lead

This model guarantees accurate control and complete traceability of the editorial process.


Dashboard and Contributions

The Dashboard is the personal resource management area for all authenticated users.

It can be accessed through the user menu (profile icon in the upper-right corner) and consists of a table listing the resources associated with the user or their working group.

The table displays:

Users with the roles of Researcher and Reviewer can manage only their own resources, whereas WP Leads can view the entire list and intervene in approval or rejection processes.

Approve / Reject


Role of the WP Lead

The WP Lead plays a key supervisory and control role over the entire editorial workflow.

In addition to standard creation and editing functionalities, the WP Lead has additional privileges within the Dashboard:

These functions make the WP Lead the primary authority responsible for the quality and consistency of published content.


Security and Traceability

Every creation, modification, or approval operation is recorded in the system with the following parameters:

This ensures a high level of auditability and transparency, in line with the security policies of ITSERR and RESILIENCE.


Resource Modifications

The system includes advanced editing tools that allow users to intervene on resources that have already been saved:

All modifications are tracked within the system and submitted for verification by the WP Lead, who approves or rejects the updates.

These functionalities make data management dynamic and collaborative, in accordance with the academic validation principles of the ITSERR project.