====== Lifecycle Summary and Conclusions ====== ===== Overview of the Transnational Access Process ===== The WP11 – Transnational Access (TNA) platform supports a structured and traceable process that guides users through all phases of the Transnational Access programme. The overall workflow can be summarised as follows: * creation and publication of the Call for Application by the TNA Manager; * submission of the Research Proposal by the Fellow; * formal verification and initiation of the Peer Review process; * scientific evaluation of proposals by the Peer Reviewers; * final decision of acceptance or rejection; * planning and management of the research visit; * reporting of expenses and upload of outputs; * completion and archiving of activities. Each phase is governed by statuses, roles, and permissions that ensure the correctness and consistency of the process. ---- ===== Lifecycle Management and Status Control ===== The operation of the platform is based on a controlled lifecycle model, in which each object (Call, Research Proposal, Visit) evolves through predefined statuses. The transition from one status to another: * is permitted only to specific roles; * is constrained by precise operational rules; * is recorded by the system for audit and transparency purposes. This approach prevents unauthorised actions and guarantees the correct sequence of activities. ---- ===== Roles and Responsibilities in the Process ===== The proper functioning of the Transnational Access process is ensured by the clear separation of roles: * the Fellow is responsible for submitting the application, participating in the visit, and reporting the activities carried out; * the TNA Manager coordinates the process, manages the Calls, and supervises the evaluation phases; * the Host Coordinator supports the organisation and management of research visits; * the Peer Reviewer contributes to the scientific evaluation of the Research Proposals. The platform automatically enforces the permissions associated with each role, ensuring consistency and accountability. ---- ===== Traceability and Transparency ===== All actions performed within the platform are recorded and linked to the events that generated them. In particular, the system ensures: * preservation of the historical record of Research Proposals and Calls; * traceability of decisions and evaluations; * recording of communications and notifications; * availability of information for monitoring and reporting purposes. This mechanism supports the transparency requirements defined by the ITSERR project. ---- ===== Conclusions ===== The WP11 – Transnational Access (TNA) platform represents a central tool for the efficient and coordinated management of the Transnational Access activities of the ITSERR project. Thanks to a structured workflow, a clear definition of roles, and an integrated notification system, the platform ensures a consistent experience for all actors involved and supports the entire lifecycle of Transnational Access, from the publication of Calls to the completion of research visits.