plorabunt:introduction
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| plorabunt:introduction [2026/01/15 16:37] – fincons | plorabunt:introduction [2026/01/15 16:50] (current) – [Project context] fincons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ==== Platform access ==== | ||
| - | Access to the PLORABUNT platform is managed through Keycloak (D4Science Identity Provider), allowing users to authenticate via several academic or social identity providers: | + | ==== Research and data exploration approach ==== |
| - | * Academic / Other | + | PLORABUNT is designed to support the structured exploration and analysis of episodes of violence or attacks occurring in places of worship through a data-driven research approach. |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | * GitHub | + | |
| - | * ORCID | + | |
| - | * CNR-ISTI | + | |
| - | Unauthenticated | + | The platform provides advanced search functionalities that allow users to query the dataset using both free-text |
| - | However, they are not allowed | + | Search results can be refined according |
| - | ---- | + | PLORABUNT integrates interactive visualization tools that enable users to analyze data both in list-based views and through geographic representations, |
| - | ==== User roles ==== | + | |
| - | The platform defines three main user profiles, each with specific responsibilities and permissions. | + | This approach allows researchers |
| - | + | ||
| - | ^ Role ^ Description ^ Main permissions ^ | + | |
| - | | **Admin** | Technical user account employed by the management team for setup and maintenance operations. | Backend management, system maintenance, | + | |
| - | | **WPLead** | User responsible for reviewing and validating requests submitted by Researchers. | Can approve, reject, delete, or view submitted requests. | | + | |
| - | | **Researcher** | User enabled | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Requests submitted by Researchers are reviewed by the WPLead according to the following logic: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * If approved, the resource is published in the central database. | + | |
| - | * If rejected, the resource is returned to Draft status, accompanied by a rejection motivation that allows the user to modify and resubmit the request. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This workflow ensures data quality and consistency before publication, | + | |
plorabunt/introduction.1768491436.txt.gz · Last modified: by fincons
