Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hortus:publish:contributions [2026/04/07 12:25] – savino.frisardi
+++ hortus:publish:contributions [2026/04/07 12:30] (current) – savino.frisardi
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
-IMMAGINE
+{{:hortus:publish:mycontributiontracking.jpg?600|IMMAGINE}}
 ----
@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 ====Typical lifecycle logic====
+A simple way to understand My Contributions is to read it as a lifecycle monitor.
+^ Lifecycle stage ^ What it usually means in My Contributions ^
+| **Draft** | You created the item, but it is still a work in progress and not yet fully submitted. |
+| **Waiting for approval / waiting for moderation** | You submitted the item, and it is now waiting for a moderator or authorised reviewer to take a decision. |
+| **Approved** | The contribution has passed the review stage and can move into the next functional state of the platform. |
+| **Rejected** | The contribution was not accepted in its current form and may need revision before resubmission. |
+This lifecycle visibility is one of the strongest aspects of the feature. It gives the researcher a concrete understanding of how research data and entities evolve inside HORTUS.
 ====Why this feature is important for researchers====
@@ Line 87: / Line 97: @@
-==== What it manages ====
-  * drafts
-  * submitted items
-  * approved content
-  * rejected items
-  * published outputs
-----
-==== Why this matters ====
-  * centralised control of your work
-  * visibility of lifecycle status
-  * easier management of revisions
-----
-==== Structure ====
-Items are usually organised by:
-  * type (resource, project, event, metadata)
-  * status (draft, pending, approved, published)
-----
-==== How to read lifecycle panels ====
-Each item shows:
-  * current status
-  * required actions (if any)
-  * history of changes
-----
-==== Typical lifecycle logic ====
-  * Create item → Draft
-  * Submit → Pending
-  * Review → Approved / Rejected
-  * If approved → Published
-  * If rejected → revise and resubmit
-----
-===== Moderation workflow =====
-Moderation is a core feature of HORTUS.
-----
-==== What moderators check ====
-  * content quality
-  * metadata completeness
-  * permissions
-  * consistency
-----
-==== Outcomes ====
-  * Approved → item progresses
-  * Rejected → revisions required
-----
-==== Implications for users ====
-  * publication is not immediate
-  * quality standards must be met
-  * iteration may be required
-----
-===== Best practices for publishing =====
-  * complete all metadata fields
-  * use clear and accurate descriptions
-  * attach relevant files
-  * verify permissions before submission
-  * review content before submitting
-----
-===== Summary =====
-Publishing in HORTUS is:
-  * structured
-  * moderated
-  * metadata-driven
-Users can:
-  * create multiple types of content
-  * track their lifecycle
-  * improve quality through review
-  * disseminate research outputs effectively
-----